JOHANNESBURG, South Africa — South African opposition leader Julius Malema has been sentenced to five years in prison following his conviction over firing a firearm in public during a 2018 political rally—raising major questions about his political future and the stability of his party.
The ruling, delivered on Thursday, relates to an incident during celebrations marking the fifth anniversary of his Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) party in Eastern Cape province, where he was accused of discharging an assault rifle in violation of the country’s Firearms Control Act.
Malema, who is 45, denied the charge during proceedings, arguing that the weapon used was a toy gun. His legal team has already indicated plans to appeal the sentence.
His party has strongly rejected the ruling, describing the case as politically motivated.
“The party calls the case a ‘witch hunt.’”
If the conviction and sentence are upheld, Malema could be disqualified from serving as a member of parliament—potentially reshaping the leadership structure of the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), which remains one of South Africa’s largest opposition parties with roughly 10 per cent representation in the National Assembly.
Political analysts say the verdict introduces unprecedented uncertainty for the party, which has been closely associated with Malema since its formation.
“For him now, it might just be the end of the road,” independent political analyst Ralph Mathekga said. “The party had no plan regarding succession … (It is) difficult to imagine the EFF without Malema.”
Once a prominent youth leader in the ruling African National Congress, Malema rose quickly through the ranks before becoming ANC Youth League president in 2008.
He was later expelled from the party in 2011 following disciplinary proceedings over what officials described as divisive conduct. Two years later, he founded the Economic Freedom Fighters, positioning the party as a radical left-wing movement advocating for land redistribution, nationalisation of key industries, and economic transformation.
Since then, Malema has built a strong following among young Black South Africans, particularly students and unemployed graduates disillusioned with inequality and economic stagnation in the post-apartheid era.
South Africa continues to face one of the world’s highest unemployment rates, a backdrop that has helped sustain support for the EFF’s populist economic messaging.
Malema has long been a divisive figure in South African politics. His critics accuse him of inflammatory rhetoric and populist posturing, while supporters see him as a voice for economic justice.
He has repeatedly defended the singing of the struggle-era song “Kill the Boer (farmer)”, which has sparked controversy internationally. Courts in South Africa have previously ruled that the chant does not constitute hate speech, though it continues to draw criticism from political opponents and foreign commentators.
Claims circulating in some international political circles, including assertions linked to U.S. President Donald Trump, that the chant calls for violence against white farmers, have been widely disputed. There is no evidence of systematic targeting of white farmers on political grounds.
Also Read: UK denies entry to South African politician Julius Malema over ‘public good’ concerns
Critics have also questioned Malema’s personal wealth, pointing to a lifestyle that includes luxury assets, which they say contrasts with his anti-elite messaging.
Malema has consistently rejected such criticism, arguing that political leadership does not require personal poverty.
“Being a revolutionary is about the content of your mind and not what clothes you wear or what cars you drive.”
He has also faced previous legal scrutiny, including corruption-related allegations. In 2015, a court dismissed money laundering charges linked to government contracts.
Malema’s legal team is expected to pursue an appeal, which could delay or potentially overturn the sentence. However, the ruling has already intensified debate over succession within the EFF and the party’s long-term direction.
Analysts say the outcome of the appeal will be critical not only for Malema’s political survival, but also for the future identity of one of South Africa’s most influential opposition movements.
